Aortic Regurgitation Quantification Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Association With Clinical Outcome

 
δείτε την πρωτότυπη σελίδα τεκμηρίου
στον ιστότοπο του αποθετηρίου του φορέα για περισσότερες πληροφορίες και για να δείτε όλα τα ψηφιακά αρχεία του τεκμηρίου*
κοινοποιήστε το τεκμήριο



Aortic Regurgitation Quantification Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Association With Clinical Outcome

Francis, J. M.
Greenwood, J. P.
Christiansen, J. P.
Neubauer, S.
Mohiaddin, R.
Myerson, S. G.
Banning, A. P.
d'Arcy, J.
Karamitsos, Theodoros

Background—Current indications for surgery in patients with significant aortic regurgitation (AR) focus on symptoms and left ventricular (LV) dilation/dysfunction. However, prognosis is already reduced by this stage and earlier identification of patients for surgery could be beneficial. Quantifying the regurgitation may help, but there is limited data on its link with outcome. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can accurately quantify AR, and we examined whether this was associated with the future need for surgery. Methods and Results—113 patients with echocardiographic moderate or severe AR were monitored for up to 9 years (mean 2.6±2.1 years) following a CMR scan, and the progression to symptoms or other indications for surgery was monitored. AR quantification identified outcome with high accuracy: 85% of the 39 subjects with regurgitant fraction >33% progressed to surgery (mostly within 3 years) compared to 8% of 74 subjects with regurgitant fraction ≤33% (p<0.0001); area under the curve on receiver operating characteristic analysis 0.93 (p<0.0001). This ability remained strong on time-dependent Kaplan-Meier survival curves. CMR-derived end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) >246ml had good, though lower, discriminatory ability (AUC 0.88) but the combination of this with regurgitant fraction provided the best discriminatory power. Conclusions—High degrees of CMR-quantified AR were associated with the development of symptoms or other indications for surgery. Quantifying AR showed slightly better discriminatory ability than 'Gold-standard' CMR ventricular volume assessment. This could provide a new paradigm for the timing of surgical intervention but requires confirmation in a clinical trial.

Article / Άρθρο
info:eu-repo/semantics/article

Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης (EL)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (EN)

Αγγλική γλώσσα

2012
2016-10-11T10:23:57Z


Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης, Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας, Τμήμα Ιατρικής

Circulation, vol.126 no.12 [2012] p.1452-1460
urn:ISSN:0009-7322

This record is part of 'IKEE', the Institutional Repository of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki's Library and Information Centre found at http://ikee.lib.auth.gr. Unless otherwise stated above, the record metadata were created by and belong to Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Library, Greece and are made available to the public under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). Unless otherwise stated in the record, the content and copyright of files and fulltext documents belong to their respective authors. Out-of-copyright content that was digitized, converted, processed, modified, etc by AUTh Library, is made available to the public under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). You are kindly requested to make a reference to AUTh Library and the URL of the record containing the resource whenever you make use of this material.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess



*Η εύρυθμη και αδιάλειπτη λειτουργία των διαδικτυακών διευθύνσεων των συλλογών (ψηφιακό αρχείο, καρτέλα τεκμηρίου στο αποθετήριο) είναι αποκλειστική ευθύνη των αντίστοιχων Φορέων περιεχομένου.