Long-term survival after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer in the remnant stomach: comparison with radical surgery

 
This item is provided by the institution :

Repository :
Annals of Gastroenterology
see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*
share




2014 (EN)

Long-term survival after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer in the remnant stomach: comparison with radical surgery (EN)

Yamamoto, Sachiko
Takeuchi, Yoji
Akasaka, Tomofumi
Aoi, Kenji
Matsuura, Noriko
Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
Kishi, Kentaro
Ito, Takashi
Uedo, Noriya
Higashino, Koji
Iishi, Hiroyasu
Dainaka, Katsuyuki
Hanaoka, Noboru
Yamashina, Takeshi
Fujii, Mototsugu
Ishihara, Ryu
Kanesaka, Takashi

Background Endoscopic resection (ER) has recently become standard treatment, even for early gastric cancer (EGC) in the remnant stomach. We aimed to compare long-term survival after ER versus radical surgery for EGC in the remnant stomach.Methods We retrospectively compared overall and cause-specific survival of patients who had undergone ER or radical surgery for EGC in the remnant stomach from 1998 to 2012.Results During the study period, 32 patients with intramucosal (M), two with shallow submucosal (SM1) and eight with deep submucosal (SM2) cancers had undergone ER (ER group) whereas six with M and seven with SM2 cancers had undergone surgery (surgery group). All patients were followed up for a median of 60 months; during follow up, 15 patients died, including three in the ER group with SM2 cancer who died of gastric cancer. The overall 5-year survival rates of M-SM1 and SM2 cancer patients in the ER and surgery groups were 89%, 48%, 80%, and 67%, respectively (P=0.079). The disease-specific 5-year survival rates of M-SM1 and SM2 cancer patients in the ER and surgery groups were 100%, 48%, 100%, and 100%, respectively (P=0.000). Operation time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ER than the surgery group (P<0.001). Grade 2 perforation occurred in two patients in the ER group and Grade 3 anastomotic leakage in two patients in the surgery group.Conclusion ER provides excellent outcomes, comparable with those of radical surgery, in patients with M-SM1 gastric cancer in the remnant stomach; however, patients with SM2 cancer require radical surgery.Keywords Early gastric cancer in the remnant stomach, long-term outcomes, endoscopic muosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissectionAnn Gastroenterol 2015; 28 (1): 66-71 (EN)

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


English

2014-12-23


Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (EN)

1792-7463
1108-7471
Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 28, No 1 (2015); 66 (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)