Choice of sedation and its impact on adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies

RDF 

 
Το τεκμήριο παρέχεται από τον φορέα :
Ελληνική Γαστροεντερολογική Εταιρία
Αποθετήριο :
Annals of Gastroenterology
δείτε την καρτέλα τεκμηρίου
μέσα από τον ιστότοπο του αποθετηρίου του φορέα *
κοινοποιήστε το τεκμήριο



Σημασιολογικός εμπλουτισμός/ομογενοποίηση από το EKT

2016 (EL)
Choice of sedation and its impact on adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies (EN)

Berry, Andrew C.; University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
Nakshabendi, Rahman; University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
John, Bijo K.; University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Munoz, Juan C.; University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA

None (EN)

Background Studies have demonstrated that the use of sedation (regardless of type) increases polyp detection rates during colonoscopy. Compared to conscious sedation (CS), propofol sedation (PS) has led to detection of more advanced polyps, yet no apparent difference was found in the overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) in patients undergoing colonoscopy for various reasons. We aimed to assess whether there was a significant diff erence in the ADR in patients specifically undergoing screening colonoscopies using PS versus CS.Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 699 consecutive patients who underwent inpatient screening colonoscopies at one academic inpatient center. The decision to perform endoscopy using PS versus CS was determined on an individual basis by each provider, taking into account various patient parameters.Results No significant difference was noted between ADR or location of detected adenomas between the CS and PS groups. When accounting for each variable, only total endoscopy time of less than 20 min resulted in a statistically signifi cant ADR difference between the two sedation groups (CS: 15.6% vs PS: 21.3%, P = 0.038).Conclusion ADR in screening colonoscopies is not increased by the use of PS compared to CS. While the use of propofol-based anesthesia is clearly associated with increased patient satisfaction and pain levels, the ADR is not enhanced, and its widespread use in screening colonoscopy sedation should still be investigated.Keywords Adenoma detection rate, colonoscopy, propofol sedation, conscious sedation, gastroenterology fellow trainingAnn Gastroenterol 2016; 29 (1): 50-55 (EN)

Ελληνική Γαστροεντερολογική Εταιρία (EL)
Hellenic Gastroenterologiki Company (EN)

2016-01-08


Annals of Gastroenterology (EN)

Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 29, No 1 (2016); 50 (EN)



*Η εύρυθμη και αδιάλειπτη λειτουργία των διαδικτυακών διευθύνσεων των συλλογών (ψηφιακό αρχείο, καρτέλα τεκμηρίου στο αποθετήριο) είναι αποκλειστική ευθύνη των αντίστοιχων Φορέων περιεχομένου.