On the research and the writing phase of the historian's work

 
δείτε την πρωτότυπη σελίδα τεκμηρίου
στον ιστότοπο του αποθετηρίου του φορέα για περισσότερες πληροφορίες και για να δείτε όλα τα ψηφιακά αρχεία του τεκμηρίου*
κοινοποιήστε το τεκμήριο




2013 (EL)

On the research and the writing phase of the historian's work (EN)

White, Hayden

This comment on Chris Lorenz’s comment on my work indicates a number of typical failings of reviewers, of which Lorenz’s comments on my talk are typical. One, like most philosophers, Lorenz treats my work as a whole rather than as a congeries of individual works as if they were all written and published at the same time. He finds inconsistencies or contradictions between works written many years apart. My response is that many of these inconsistencies are a result of changes in my point of view over time. Secondly, instead of quoting a passage from my work and criticising it, Lorenz typically paraphrases an argument and then proceeds to criticise his own paraphrase. Often, I do not recognise the paraphrase as a position I hold. Third, I hold that historical writing is often and should be more associative than logical, more poetic than technical. Fourth, about causality in history, I do not think that we have any examples of a universal causal law of historical change or structure. So his demand for a causal law from me is beside the point. (EN)

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Commentary (EN)


Ιστορείν

Αγγλική γλώσσα

2013-06-30


Cultural and Intellectual History Society (EN)

2241-2816
1108-3441
Historein; Τόμ. 14 Αρ. 1 (2014): On the Edge of History and Philosophy; 71-74 (EL)
Historein; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2014): On the Edge of History and Philosophy; 71-74 (EN)

Copyright (c) 2014 Hayden White (EN)



*Η εύρυθμη και αδιάλειπτη λειτουργία των διαδικτυακών διευθύνσεων των συλλογών (ψηφιακό αρχείο, καρτέλα τεκμηρίου στο αποθετήριο) είναι αποκλειστική ευθύνη των αντίστοιχων Φορέων περιεχομένου.