Motivated phonological templates in Sign Language

 
This item is provided by the institution :
University of Patras
Repository :
Pasithee - e-publishing platform/service for Open Access journals
see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*
share




2016 (EN)
Motivated phonological templates in Sign Language (EN)

Sandler, Wendy; University of Haifa
Belsitzman, Gal; University of Haifa

A basic design feature of language is duality of patterning, the existence of a meaningless level of elements that combine to create meaningful morphemes and words (Hockett 1960). Although the signs of sign languages have iconic origins, Stokoe (1960) showed that sign languages do have a meaningless level, akin to phonology, setting the stage for much subsequent linguistic research on sign languages at all levels (Sandler and Lillo-Martin 2006). Here we show, following Lepic et al. (2016), that part of the phonological structure across sign languages is often motivated by meaning. Specifically, two-handedness is motivated, as are details of structure in two-handed signs previously believed to be strictly phonological and hence meaningless, such as symmetry, dominance, type of movement, and patterns of contact between the two hands. We further develop a templatic model of sign structure (Sandler 1986, 1989) to reveal which aspects of the phonological form in two-handed signs are often so motivated. Noting ways in which meaning penetrates phonology in spoken languages too, we conclude that the line between the dual levels of patterning in language is not as sharp as is commonly believed. (EN)

Άρθρο που αξιολογήθηκε από ομότιμους αξιολογητές (EL)

sign language (EN)
motivation in phonology (EN)
two-handed signs (EN)
duality of patterning (EN)

Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών (EL)
University of Patras (EN)

English

2016-08-22


Mediterranean Morphology Meetings (MMM) (EN)

Mediterranean Morphology Meeting; Τόμ. 10 (2016): Quo vadis morphology?; 31-44 (EL)
Mediterranean Morphology Meetings; Τόμ. 10 (2016): Quo vadis morphology?; 31-44 (EN)



*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)