Thematic Analysis and its Interdisciplinary Interest:: Advantage or a Disadvantage for Holton’s Purpose?

This item is provided by the institution :
Applied Philosophy Research Laboratory   

Repository :
Conatus  | ΕΚΤ eJournals   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Thematic Analysis and its Interdisciplinary Interest:: Advantage or a Disadvantage for Holton’s Purpose? (EN)

Alahou, Georges

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

2023-06-30


The term “thematic analysis” abounds in research articles and appears in the titles of books, without the authors of these writings being primarily concerned with defining what thematic analysis is. Thematic analysis is present in the current vocabulary of several disciplines and is presented as a working method of choice in psychology, sociology, or linguistics, to name but a few. This article seeks to situate thematic analysis in the thinking of Holton Gerald, who introduced it into the philosophy of science as a rational approach that can account for scientific discovery and progress. The aim of this article is to see whether the attested interdisciplinary interest nature of thematic analysis argues in favour or against Holton’s claim of making it a credible and acceptable tool in philosophy of science. (EN)


interdisciplinary interest (EN)
thematic analysis (EN)
method (EN)
Holton (EN)
themata (EN)

Conatus-Περιοδικό Φιλοσοφίας

English

The NKUA Applied Philosophy Research Laboratory (EN)


2459-3842
2653-9373
Conatus - Περιοδικό Φιλοσοφίας; Τόμ. 8 Αρ. 1 (2023): Conatus - Journal of Philosophy; 29-53 (EL)
Conatus - Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Conatus - Journal of Philosophy; 29-53 (EN)

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright (c) 2023 Georges Alahou (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)