Corrigendum to: A tutorial on AGREEprep an analytical greenness metric for sample preparation

This item is provided by the institution :
Technical University of Crete   

Repository :
Institutional Repository Technical University of Crete   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Corrigendum to: A tutorial on AGREEprep an analytical greenness metric for sample preparation (EN)

Ψυλλακη Ελευθερια (EL)
Pena-Pereira, Francisco Javier (EN)
Tobiszewski, Marek (EN)
Wojnowski Wojciech (EN)
Psyllaki Eleftheria (EN)

other
conferenceItem

2022


The authors have noticed that the parameter assigned in Criterion 3 (Target sustainable, reusable, and renewable materials) during the evaluation of the second method involving SPME was not correct. As a result, the assessment results appearing in Fig. 3 were also not correct. The parameter assigned for this Criterion should have been “Only sustainable and renewable materials are used several times” with a score=1.0, rather than “< 25% of reagents and materials are sustainable or renewable and can only be used once” with a score=0.0. The latter parameter was not correct nor in accordance with a past report published by the same authors (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2022.116553). The correct versions of Fig. 3 and Fig. S3A, Fig. S3B, Fig. S3C are given below and the discussion concerning Scenario 2 in the second evaluated method involving SPME should be as follows: ........ “On the other hand, the final score of Scenario 2 (promoting safe chemicals/materials) was superior to the one obtained when applying the default weights, mainly due to the absence of non-sustainable materials and the green and “safe” features inherent to the SPME technology.” The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused. (EN)

English

Elsevier (EN)

Πολυτεχνείο Κρήτης (EL)
Technical University of Crete (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)