Comparison of digital versus fiberoptic cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or treatment of biliary stones

This item is provided by the institution :
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology   

Repository :
Annals of Gastroenterology   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Comparison of digital versus fiberoptic cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or treatment of biliary stones (EN)

Dimas, Ioannis D.
Velegraki, Magdalini
Paspatis, Gregorios
Papastergiou, Vasilios
Vardas, Emmanouil
Fragaki, Maria
Mpitouli, Afroditi
Voudoukis, Evangelos
Theodoropoulou, Angeliki
Giannikaki, Elpida
Chlouverakis, Gregorios

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

2019-02-28


Background Recently, the introduction of the novel digital SpyGlass™ DS Direct Visualization system (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA, USA) has signaled the transition into the era of digital singleoperator cholangioscopy (D-SOC). We sought to compare the clinical utility between fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscopy (F-SOC) and D-SOC in a tertiary-care referral center in Greece. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) procedures performed over an 8-year period (2009-2017) at a single tertiary-care referral center. The study population consisted of consecutive adults referred for cholangioscopy for a variety of clinical indications, including biliary strictures, difficult biliary stones and migrated or occluded pancreatic or biliary stents. Results A total of 2763 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures were performed during the study period. Overall, SOC was performed in 68 (2.46%) procedures (F-SOC=39, D-SOC=29), showing a significant increase in the utilization of cholangioscopy during the D-SOC (29/599; 4.84%) compared with the F-SOC (39/2124; 1.83%) period (P=0.0001). The overall technical success of diagnostic SOC was 69.1% (38/55), being marginally higher for D-SOC (83.3%) than for F-SOC (58.1%), although not reaching statistical significance (P=0.07). Conclusions D-SOC was utilized more frequently in our tertiary-care non-academic referral center, demonstrating a favorable safety profile and a trend towards a marginally higher technical success rate for the diagnosis of biliary strictures compared with F-SOC. Keywords Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, single-operator cholangioscopy, fiberoptic Spyglass, digital spyglass Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32 (2): 199-204 (EN)


English

Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (EN)


1792-7463
1108-7471
Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 32, No 2 (2019); 199 (EN)

Copyright (c) 2019 Annals of Gastroenterology (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)