Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of adenomas and colorectal serrated lesions: a prospective clinical study

This item is provided by the institution :
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology   

Repository :
Annals of Gastroenterology   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of adenomas and colorectal serrated lesions: a prospective clinical study (EN)

Nogueira, Pedro Bothrel
Nascimento, Ricardo Castejon
Rocha, Renata Figueiredo
Albuquerque, Walton
Marianelli, Bruna Santos
Arantes, Vitor Nunes
Carreiro, Rodrigo Albuquerque
Pereira, Roberto Motta
Campos, Frederico Fonseca

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

2021-07-16


Background Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) without submucosal injection has been described as an alternative technique to the endoscopic resection of adenomas and colorectal serrated lesions. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of UEMR in a Brazilian setting. Methods This was a prospective observational study of consecutive patients who underwent UEMR between January and July 2019, in a single tertiary care center. Inclusion criteria were lesions without endoscopic stigmata of deep submucosal invasion in patients referred for endoscopic resection of colorectal adenomas, and serrated lesions detected in a previous colonoscopy. The following features were assessed: complete resection rate, en bloc resection rate, resection time, adverse events, and resection infeasibility. Results A total of 36 patients underwent UEMR for 51 colorectal lesions. The mean/median lesion size was 16.24/13 mm and the mean/median resection time was 16.97/9.19 min. Histopathology revealed the following: tubular adenoma (43.1%), tubulovillous adenoma (13.7%), serrated lesions (41.2%), and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (2%). Complete resection was achieved in 86.3% of cases; 52.9% of the lesions were removed en bloc, while 47.1% were resected in a piecemeal fashion. UEMR was feasible in 96.1% of cases and failed on 2 occasions, requiring conversion to standard endoscopic mucosal resection. Minor intraoperative bleedingoccurred in 5 patients (9.8%) and only 1 presented with delayed bleeding (2%), all controlled endoscopically. Conclusion UEMR for removal of adenomas and colorectal serrated lesions was demonstrated to be feasible, safe and effective. Keywords Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection, colorectal adenomas, colorectal serrated lesions, colonoscopy Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34 (4): 552-558 (EN)


English

Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (EN)


1792-7463
1108-7471
Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 34, No 4 (2021); 552 (EN)

Copyright (c) 2021 Annals of Gastroenterology (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)