Training in pediatric neurogastroenterology and motility across Europe: a survey of the ESPGHAN National Societies Network 2016-2019

This item is provided by the institution :
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology   

Repository :
Annals of Gastroenterology   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Training in pediatric neurogastroenterology and motility across Europe: a survey of the ESPGHAN National Societies Network 2016-2019 (EN)

Veres, Gabor
Papadopoulou, Alexandra
Guarino, Alfredo
Urbonas, Vaidotas
Kansu, Aydan
Kelly, Deirdre
Orel, Rok
Mas, Emmanuel
Koutri, Eleni
Fotoulaki, Maria
Ribes-Koninckx, Carmen
Tjesic-Drinkovic, Duska
Furlano, Raoul I.
Georgieva, Miglena
Noni, Maria
Benninga, Marc
Roman, Enriqueta
Karagianni, Maria-Vasiliki
Hauer, Almuthe Christine
Baker, Alastair
Wilschanski, Michael
Bronsky, Jiri
Thapar, Nikhil
Posovszky, Carsten
Hoffman, Ilse
Escher, Johanna
Protheroe, Sue

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

2022-05-12


Background Pediatric gastrointestinal motility disorders present significant challenges for diagnosis and management, emphasizing the need for appropriate training in Pediatric Neurogastroenterology and Motility (PNGM). The aim of this survey, part of a comprehensive survey on training in pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, was to evaluate training related to PNGM across European training centers. Method Standardized questionnaires were collected from training centers through the National Societies Network of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN), from June 2016 to December 2019. Results In total, 100 training centers from 19 countries participated in the survey. Dedicated PNGM clinics were available in 22 centers; pH-monitoring in 60; pH/impedance in 66; standard manometry in 37; and high-resolution manometry in 33. If all motility studies were performed partially or fully by the trainees, the median (range) annual numbers/per trainee were as follows: pH-monitoring 30 (1-500); pH/impedance 17 (1-131); standard manometries 10 (1-150); and high-resolution manometries 8 (1-75). The motility assessment was performed by pediatric gastroenterologists (43 centers); adult gastroenterologists (10 centers); pediatric surgeons (5 centers); and both pediatric gastroenterologists and pediatric surgeons (9 centers). Annual numbers ≤10 for pH-monitoring, pH/impedance, standard manometries and high-resolution manometries were reported by 7 (12%), 15 (23%), 11 (30%) and 14 (42%) centers, respectively. Conclusions Significant differences exist in PNGM-related infrastructure, staff and procedural volumes at training centers across Europe. ESPGHAN and the National Societies should take initiatives to ensure the acquisition of competence in PNGM-related knowledge and skills, and develop strategies for assessment and accreditation. An infographic is available for this article at: http://www.annalsgastro.gr/files/journals/1/earlyview/2022/Infographic-AG6486.pdf Keywords Gastrointestinal motility training, children, training in pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition Ann Gastroenterol 2022; 35 (3): 325-332 (EN)


English

Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (EN)


1792-7463
1108-7471
Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 35, No 3 (2022); 325 (EN)

Copyright (c) 2022 Annals of Gastroenterology (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)