Comparative performance and external validation of three different scores in predicting inadequate bowel preparation among Greek inpatients undergoing colonoscopy

This item is provided by the institution :
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology   

Repository :
Annals of Gastroenterology   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Comparative performance and external validation of three different scores in predicting inadequate bowel preparation among Greek inpatients undergoing colonoscopy (EN)

Tziatzios, Georgios
Thomopoulos, Konstantinos
Kapizioni, Christina
Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
Potamianos, Spyridon
Hassan, Cessare
Christodoulou, Dimitrios
Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
Fuccio, Lorenzo
Frazzoni, Leonardo
Papadopoulos, Vasilios
Facciorusso, Antonio

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

2022-12-25


Background Predictive scores aim to predict bowel preparation adequacy among hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy. We evaluated the comparative efficacy of these scores in predicting inadequate bowel cleansing in a cohort of Greek inpatients. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of data generated from a cohort of inpatients undergoing colonoscopy in 4 tertiary Greek centers to validate the 3 models currently available (models A, B and C). We used the Akaike information criterion to quantify the performance of each model, while Harrell’s C-index, as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), verified the discriminative ability to predict inadequate bowel prep. Primary endpoint was the comparison of performance among models for predicting inadequate bowel cleansing. Results Overall, 261 patients—121 (46.4%) female, 100 (38.3%) bedridden, mean age 70.7±15.4 years—were included in the analysis. Model B showed the highest performance (Harrell’s C-index: AUC 77.2% vs. 72.6% and 57.5%, compared to models A and C, respectively). It also achieved higher performance for the subgroup of mobilized inpatients (Harrell’s C-index: AUC 72.21% vs. 64.97% and 59.66%, compared to models A and C, respectively). Model B also performed better in predicting patients with incomplete colonoscopy due to inadequate bowel preparation (Harrell’s C-index: AUC 74.23% vs. 69.07% and 52.76%, compared to models A and C, respectively). Conclusions Predictive model B outperforms its comparators in the prediction of inpatients with inadequate bowel preparation. This model is particularly advantageous when used to evaluate mobilized inpatients. Keywords Colonoscopy, bowel preparation, predictive score Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36 (1): 25-31 (EN)


English

Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (EN)


1792-7463
1108-7471
Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 36, No 1 (2023); 25 (EN)

Copyright (c) 2022 Annals of Gastroenterology (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)