1. Home page
  2. Search

Real-world outcomes of collaborative surgery for gastrointestinal tumors by endoscopists and surgeons: a single-center retrospective analysis of 131 patients

This item is provided by the institution :
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology   

Repository :
Annals of Gastroenterology   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Real-world outcomes of collaborative surgery for gastrointestinal tumors by endoscopists and surgeons: a single-center retrospective analysis of 131 patients (EN)
Sakanushi, Atsuko
Hoashi, Toshihiko
Ishikawa, Yumiko
Nakagome, Shun
Higuchi, Kazutoshi
Sakamoto, Koji
Goto, Osamu
Yoshida, Hiroshi
Iwakiri, Katsuhiko
Akimoto, Naohiko
Okubo, Kimihiro
Matsushita, Akira
Koizumi, Eriko
Sakurazawa, Nobuyuki
Hagiwara, Nobutoshi
Habu, Tsugumi
Omori, Jun
Saeki, Hidehisa
Ohashi, Ryuji
Matsuda, Akihisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
2024-11-20
Background Collaborative surgery by both endoscopists and surgeons is considered effective for providing less invasive local resection of gastrointestinal tumors, to offset the limitations of either pure endoscopic treatments or surgical intervention. The clinical outcomes of collaborative surgery were evaluated to investigate the feasibility and safety of this approach. Methods In this single-center retrospective observational study, we collected data from consecutive patients who underwent collaborative surgery for lesions located from the laryngopharynx to the anus. The completeness of collaboration, technical success, procedure time, postoperative hospitalization period, and occurrence of adverse events were analyzed. Results Collaboration surgery was performed for 134 lesions (33 laryngopharyngeal, 2 esophageal, 89 gastric, 8 duodenal and 2 recto-anal) in 131 patients. Collaboration completeness was achieved in 129 lesions (96%). En bloc resection and pathological R0 resection of lesions were achieved in 127 (95%) and 124 (93%) lesions, respectively. The mean procedure time was 188 min. The mean time of discharge was the 11th postoperative day. Five patients (4%) developed relevant postoperative adverse events. Conclusions These results indicate that collaborative surgery by endoscopists and surgeons was feasible and safe, and may contribute to providing less invasive treatment than conventional surgery. Collaborative surgery is worth considering as a flexible and reliable surgical option, when cooperation may outperform either treatment alone. Keywords Collaborative surgery, endoscopic full-thickness resection, endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery, endoscopic submucosal dissection, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery Ann Gastroenterol 2024; 37 (6): 699-707 (EN)
English
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (EN)
1792-7463
1108-7471
Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 37, No 6 (2024); 699 (EN)
Copyright (c) 2024 Annals of Gastroenterology (EN)
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology
Original Articles



*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)