This item is provided by the institution :
Applied Philosophy Research Laboratory   

Repository :
Conatus  | ΕΚΤ eJournals   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Anger and Reconciliation (EN)

Koch, Bernhard

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

2023-12-31


Emotions are a much-neglected aspect of contemporary peace ethics, which is surprising if only because the concept of positive peace encompasses a certain emotional commitment. Moreover, some emotions explicitly promote separation, conflict, and even violence. Anger is an ambivalent emotion that, on the one hand, evokes conflict but, on the other hand, expresses a sense of justice. Anger can be soothed by forgiveness, and forgiveness can lead to reconciliation. However, in individual ethics, the conceptual and factual connections are easier to explain than in political contexts, where collectives must be considered as actors. Martha Nussbaum recently subjected both anger and forgiveness to a well-founded critique. In contrast to this, however, a qualified defense will be made in the following. (EN)


Martha Nussbaum (EN)
ethics of peace (EN)
political emotions (EN)
forgiveness (EN)
peace (EN)
anger (EN)
revisionist just war theory (EN)
reconciliation (EN)

Conatus-Περιοδικό Φιλοσοφίας

English

The NKUA Applied Philosophy Research Laboratory (EN)


2459-3842
2653-9373
Conatus - Περιοδικό Φιλοσοφίας; Τόμ. 8 Αρ. 2 (2023): Conatus - Journal of Philosophy SI: War Ethics; 279-298 (EL)
Conatus - Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Conatus - Journal of Philosophy SI: War Ethics; 279-298 (EN)

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright (c) 2023 Bernhard Koch (EN)




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)