Altmetrics should not be used for ranking of anaesthesia journals

This item is provided by the institution :
National Documentation Centre (EKT)   

Repository :
Institutional Repository of EKT "Ariadne"  | repositories EKT   

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Altmetrics should not be used for ranking of anaesthesia journals

Fassoulaki A.
Καρδάσης, Αντώνης
Vassi A.
Chantziara V.

Άρθρο σε επιστημονικό περιοδικό (EL)
Scientific journal article (EN)

2018


Traditional bibliometric indicators, such as Journal Impact Factor™, used for journal ranking have been criticised.1, 2 Altmetric™ provide a real-time score of attention when a publication appears online using social media sources (Altmetric LLP, WeWork-Kings Place, 7th Floor, 90 York Way, London, N1 9AG) last revision lists 15 of them),3 each contributing to a different degree to the final Altmetric attention score. We compared the ranking of five top anaesthesia journals by journal impact factor with ranking by Altmetric. (EL)

Δείκτες και στατιστικές για έρευνα, ανάπτυξη, καινοτομία (EL)
Αναισθησιολογία και Ιατρική πόνου (EL)
Πηγές πληροφόρησης (EL)
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (EN)
Indicators and statistics for research, development, innovation (EN)
Information sources (EN)

Scientific literature (EN)
Journal impact factor (EN)
Information processing (EN)
Anesthesiology (EN)
Altmetric (EN)

English


British Journal of Anaesthesia, issue: 2, volume: 121

This is open archive. The define version is publeshed by Elsevier Ltd at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.048: Fassoulaki A, Vassi A, Kardasis A, Chantziara V. Altmetrics should not be used for ranking of anaesthesia journals. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;121(2):514-516
© 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.el




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)