1. Αρχική σελίδα
  2. Αναζήτηση

Comparing accuracy of high-risk features for detecting advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Το τεκμήριο παρέχεται από τον φορέα :
Ελληνική Γαστροεντερολογική Εταιρία   

Αποθετήριο :
Annals of Gastroenterology   

δείτε την πρωτότυπη σελίδα τεκμηρίου
στον ιστότοπο του αποθετηρίου του φορέα για περισσότερες πληροφορίες και για να δείτε όλα τα ψηφιακά αρχεία του τεκμηρίου*



Comparing accuracy of high-risk features for detecting advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (EN)
Chandrasekar Thoguluva, Vivek
Desai, Madhav
Kohli, Divyanshoo Rai
Harsh, Patel
Moole, Vishnu
bandla, Harikrishna
Dasari, Chandra
Sharma, Prateek
Duvvuri, Abhiram
Anvesh, Narimiti
Gress, Frank
Nutalapati, Venkat
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
2021-08-19
Background The American Gastroenterological Association recommends endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for evaluating pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) with ≥2 high-risk features (HRF), whereas the American College of Gastroenterology recommends EUS for ≥1 HRF. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of using ≥1 vs. ≥2 HRF for assessing the risk of advanced neoplasia (AN) and performing EUS in PCL. Methods An electronic database search was performed for eligible studies. AN was defined as pancreatic adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm or mucinous cystadenoma with high-grade dysplasia, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. HRF included cyst size ≥3 cm, solid component, and dilated pancreatic duct ≥5 mm. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of using ≥1 vs. ≥2 HRF as an indication for EUS to detect AN in PCL. Results Of 38 studies initially screened, 8 were included in the final analysis. Seven studies assessed the accuracy of ≥2 HRF and 4 studies assessed ≥1 HRF. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of EUS for detecting AN were 41.7% (95% confidence interval 19.5-67.8%), 90.8% (81.9-95.5%), 30.4% (19.4-44.2%) and 94.3% (89.6-97.0%) with ≥2HRFs, and 77.1% (66.1- 85.3%), 72.7% (50.4-87.5%), 17.95% (10.3-29.4%), 98.1% (90.8-99.6%), respectively, with ≥1 HRF. Conclusion Performing EUS for PCL with ≥1 HRF could offer greater sensitivity in detecting AN compared to ≥2 HRF, with a similar negative predictive value. Keywords Pancreatic cystic lesions, pancreatic cancer, endoscopic ultrasound, meta-analysis Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34 (5): 743-750 (EN)
Αγγλική γλώσσα
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (EN)
1792-7463
1108-7471
Annals of Gastroenterology; Volume 34, No 5 (2021); 743 (EN)
Copyright (c) 2021 Annals of Gastroenterology (EN)
Ελληνική Γαστροεντερολογική Εταιρία
Annals of Gastroenterology
Original Articles



*Η εύρυθμη και αδιάλειπτη λειτουργία των διαδικτυακών διευθύνσεων των συλλογών (ψηφιακό αρχείο, καρτέλα τεκμηρίου στο αποθετήριο) είναι αποκλειστική ευθύνη των αντίστοιχων Φορέων περιεχομένου.