1. Αρχική σελίδα
  2. Αναζήτηση

Central vascular catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters in nurse anesthesia. a perspective within the Greek health system

Το τεκμήριο παρέχεται από τον φορέα :
Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών   

Αποθετήριο :
Πέργαμος   

δείτε την πρωτότυπη σελίδα τεκμηρίου
στον ιστότοπο του αποθετηρίου του φορέα για περισσότερες πληροφορίες και για να δείτε όλα τα ψηφιακά αρχεία του τεκμηρίου*



Central vascular catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters in nurse anesthesia. a perspective within the Greek health system
Konstantinou, E.A. Karampinis, D.F. Mitsos, A.P. Konstantinou, M.I. Mariolis-Sapsakos, T. Kapritsou, M. Stafylarakis, E. Katsoulas, T. Elefsiniotis, I.
scientific_publication_article
Επιστημονική δημοσίευση - Άρθρο Περιοδικού (EL)
Scientific publication - Journal Article (EN)
2013
Purpose: We present a study comparing the insertion of central vascular catheter (CVC) and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) by an anesthesia nurse at 2 Greek University Hospitals. Methods: Eighty patients, aged 20-80 years, were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups. In group A (41 patients), a CVC was inserted in the internal jugular vein. In group B (39 patients), a pressure-injectable PICC was inserted in the basilica vein. Results: Correlations between the methods applied, the patients' characteristics, the procedures' characteristics and the overall satisfaction scores for each procedure were examined. The final results show that the patients of group B (PICC method) were more satisfied with the procedure than the patients of group A (CVC method), at the statistical significance level of a=0.01. Also, according to the results of the analysis, the PICC method offers significantly more comfort and relative satisfaction than the CVC method, at the statistical significance level of a=0.01. The satisfaction scores of "physicians" were statistically more significant, at a=0.01, for the patients of group A (classic CVCs) mainly because of the insufficient flow rate of the PICCs when compared with the CVCs and especially if one considers the fact that the physicians did not have any experience with the PICC method at all. Conclusions: PICCs under ultrasound guidance constitute the solution of choice for patients and they definitely surpass the CVCs focusing mainly on the improvement of the quality of life and the satisfaction of patients. © 2013 Wichtig Editore. (EN)
Αγγλική γλώσσα
Ερευνητικό υλικό ΕΚΠΑ
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών
Πέργαμος
Άρθρο Περιοδικού (Journal Article)



*Η εύρυθμη και αδιάλειπτη λειτουργία των διαδικτυακών διευθύνσεων των συλλογών (ψηφιακό αρχείο, καρτέλα τεκμηρίου στο αποθετήριο) είναι αποκλειστική ευθύνη των αντίστοιχων Φορέων περιεχομένου.