1. Αρχική σελίδα
  2. Αναζήτηση

Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Το τεκμήριο παρέχεται από τον φορέα :
Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών   

Αποθετήριο :
Πέργαμος   

δείτε την πρωτότυπη σελίδα τεκμηρίου
στον ιστότοπο του αποθετηρίου του φορέα για περισσότερες πληροφορίες και για να δείτε όλα τα ψηφιακά αρχεία του τεκμηρίου*



Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
Lyubenova, Anita Neupane, Dipika Levis, Brooke Wu, Yin and Sun, Ying He, Chen Krishnan, Ankur Bhandari, Parash M. and Negeri, Zelalem Imran, Mahrukh Rice, Danielle B. Azar, Marleine Chiovitti, Matthew J. Saadat, Nazanin Riehm, Kira E. Boruff, Jill T. Ioannidis, John P. A. Cuijpers, Pim and Gilbody, Simon Kloda, Lorie A. Patten, Scott B. Shrier, Ian and Ziegelstein, Roy C. Comeau, Liane Mitchell, Nicholas D. and Tonelli, Marcello Vigod, Simone N. Aceti, Franca Barnes, Jacqueline Bavle, Amar D. Beck, Cheryl T. Bindt, Carola and Boyce, Philip M. Bunevicius, Adomas Chaudron, Linda H. and Favez, Nicolas Figueiredo, Barbara Garcia-Esteve, Lluisa and Giardinelli, Lisa Helle, Nadine Howard, Louise M. Kohlhoff, Jane Kusminskas, Laima Kozinszky, Zoltan Lelli, Lorenzo and Leonardou, Angeliki A. Meuti, Valentina Rados, Sandra N. and Garcia, Purificacion N. Pawlby, Susan J. Quispel, Chantal and Robertson-Blackmore, Emma Rochat, Tamsen J. Sharp, Deborah J. and Siu, Bonnie W. M. Stein, Alan Stewart, Robert C. and Tadinac, Meri Tandon, S. Darius Tendais, Iva Toreki, Annamaria Torres-Gimenez, Anna Tran, Thach D. Trevillion, Kylee Turner, Katherine Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M. and Benedetti, Andrea Thombs, Brett D.
scientific_publication_article
Επιστημονική δημοσίευση - Άρθρο Περιοδικού (EL)
Scientific publication - Journal Article (EN)
2021
Objectives Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in individual studies. Methods We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. Results Seven thousand three hundred and fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in recent studies (>= 9 to >= 14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from 27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS >= 9 to 9.0% (95% CI: 6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS >= 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS >= 14 provided pooled prevalence closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95% prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). Conclusion EPDS >= 14 approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for prevalence estimation. (EN)
Αγγλική γλώσσα
Ερευνητικό υλικό ΕΚΠΑ
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών
Πέργαμος
Άρθρο Περιοδικού (Journal Article)



*Η εύρυθμη και αδιάλειπτη λειτουργία των διαδικτυακών διευθύνσεων των συλλογών (ψηφιακό αρχείο, καρτέλα τεκμηρίου στο αποθετήριο) είναι αποκλειστική ευθύνη των αντίστοιχων Φορέων περιεχομένου.