Roe vs Wade and the public discourse regarding reproductive rights

see the original item page
in the repository's web site and access all digital files if the item*



Roe vs Wade and the public discourse regarding reproductive rights (EN)

Karagrigoris, Pavlos

info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

2024-09-01


The following text aims to provide a socio-political analysis regarding the right to an abortion on the United States. Via the legal arguments of the scholars supporting the Originalist interpretation of the U.S constitution, it aims to understand the overturning of Roe v. Wade, which guarantees abortion as a right. However, this position isn't supportive of the limitation of women's reproductive rights but aims to transfer the decision-making process from the judicial to the legislative branch (especially on the state level). This case will be assisted through the utilization of modern arguments in favor of women's rights, the necessity of democratic dialogue and involvement with issues that pertain to human rights in liberal democracies and by the reasoning provided in Jurgen Habermas'essay «The future of human nature», which will strengthen the sentiment that in a democracy the citizens via their representatives should be the ones that decide about crucial life and death matters. (EN)


Κοινωνική Συνοχή και Ανάπτυξη

English

Επιστημονική Εταιρεία για την Κοινωνική Συνοχή και Ανάπτυξη (EPEKSA) (EN)


Social Cohesion and Development; Bd. 19 Nr. 1 (2024): No 37; 61-71 (DE)
1790-9368
2459-4156
Κοινωνική Συνοχή και Ανάπτυξη; Τόμ. 19 Αρ. 1 (2024): Νο 37; 61-71 (EL)
Social Cohesion and Development; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): No 37; 61-71 (EN)

Copyright (c) 2024 Pavlos Karagrigoris (EN)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0




*Institutions are responsible for keeping their URLs functional (digital file, item page in repository site)